Doesn't every one prefer a huge increase in risk of injury or death over a glider rack?
When I first heard that mountain climbers were hiking to the tops of mountains and jumping off on the early paragliders to get back down, I thought that was really neat.
But ten or fifteen years later, I was trying to talk with the macho clowns on Paragliding Forum and one told me that he "would rather die than have to carry a hang glider."
What had changed was they were no longer using the need to launch a paraglider from remote, inaccessible areas as a reason to fly them.
Now they were launching from roads and flying up to the tops of mountains or even the length of entire mountain ranges, something we hang glider folks had been doing since before paragliding came along.
Now paragliders, despite their considerable drawbacks, were being accepted of as a satisfactory replacement for hang gliders.
And to counter the claims of collapse as making paragliders unairworthy, paragliding enthusiasts came up with the bizarre argument that collapses were a built-in safety feature.
They appeared to be telling this stuff to each other in their own peer group, away from the laughter of the hang gliding community.
So even if our friend in the video comes up with an uncollapsible paraglider, the paragliding community would likely regard it as unsafe.
And yes, strange as it may seem, every one does consciously choose
a huge increase in risk of injury or death over a glider rack.