Sign in, say "hi", ... and be welcomed.

Re: Safe-Splat

Postby JoeF » Thu Apr 21, 2016 3:23 pm

In support of that central skid note of Rick's is a photo of some guy's powered device of 1971:
Image
Join a National Hang Gliding Organization: US Hawks at ushawks.org

View pilots' hang gliding rating at: US Hang Gliding Rating System
JoeF
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 4690
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 3:41 pm

Re: Safe-Splat

Postby JoeF » Sat Apr 23, 2016 10:04 am

Image

Large doubles ....

At site:
Dunne D.6 / D.7 - Великобритания - 1911
J.W. Dunne in the D7bis monoplane at Eastchurch in 1912 where the reconstruction from D6 was carried out.
J. W. Dunne on his monoplane at Eastchurch, where, having recovered from his illness, he has been fiying again most successfully. The Astra Co, have taken up the rights for manufacturing the Dunne machines in France.
Join a National Hang Gliding Organization: US Hawks at ushawks.org

View pilots' hang gliding rating at: US Hang Gliding Rating System
JoeF
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 4690
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 3:41 pm

Re: Safe-Splat

Postby reluctantsparrow » Mon Apr 25, 2016 11:37 am

bobk wrote:Hi Joe,

This is why I'm late today ...

safe_splat1s.gif


I really like this concept BobK, along with another computer image I think you posted of lines running from the rear of the pilots harness to the rear of the keel to arrest foreward swing of the pilot.

I have an idea based on the rear lines to the keel. the primary words there being......rear keel....
I realized this morning that the REar keel offers tremendous potential for a safe splat system that is very simple and I present it here for you guys to pick apart.

The only two positions safe splat is possible I think are the prone position and the suprone because they hang ABOVE the basetube. I can not visualize a safe splat device for a pilot in the supine position.

So, for pilots hanging ABOVE the basetube, lets take a closer look at our totally under utilized rear keel.
What if a singular line was attached from the rear of the pilots harness to a tang about where the rear lower flying wires attach to the the keel.
Now, lets say the rear portion of the keel between the kingpost and the rear wires was designed to slip inside of itself once an impact of a certain poundage was encountered. this could be as simple as an aluminum pop rivet that holds the slip joint together in regular flight but shears and allows, lets say, the smaller rear portion of the keel to slip inside of the larger front portion of the keel.
inside that keel we incorporate an air piston.
As the pilot is swinging foreward with a line attached from the rear of his/her harness to the rear of his/her keel the keel itself has began a foreward journey but is providing resistance much like an airbag does in a car to both slow down the pilots foreward momentum and LIMIT how far foreward the pilots body can ultimately swing.
Problem:
Unfortunately, this is also going to cause the rear flying wire to become slack as the keel slides into itself, allowing the downward pull of the pilots tether to bend the keel downward as it is also pulling the keel foreward....this would eventually cause the keel to fail somewhere around the kingpost/control bar apex area.....not good....so...
instead of a straight tether.....(stay with me)
The tether would run from where the rear flying wires attatch to the rear keel.....down through a pulley in the back of the pilots harness.......then back UP past the keel and past the rear of the sail to attach to the upper rear flying wire around the midway point.....so
as the lower part of the tether is pulling DOWN on the keel....the part of the tether that runs up to the rear flying wire is sucking up all the slack (like the old VG compensator lines did) in the upper rear flying wire and pulling UP on the keel at the same time......
I think this would work to hold the keel in a straight, foreward sliding position....maybe.....I will find out soon.
So I am talking about turning the rear of our keel into an air piston. Kind of like a reverse air bag.
the greatest advantage I see from a crash device like this is it fully utilizes our harnesses as into the restraint system.
Our own harnesses would be our seatbelts so to speak.
this would not add hardly any weight to our gliders.....just an extended sleeve, a couple gaskets, a bit of hydrolic oil inside the air chamber, and a v-bridle.
The air piston coud be made by anyone (whoever comes up with the best, most effective, and reliable design) and sold to hang glider manufacturers to incorporate into any current model of hang glider...
The hook-up would not be complicated either.
Leave the upper part of the v-bridle attatched to the upper rear wire where it is swaged into place.
After the pilot hooks his harness into the glider he/she simply routes the free end of the v-bridle down through the pulley in the back of his/her harness and then clips it into an extra steel tang where the rear flying wires already attach.....done....built in crash protection....go fly....
I see a problem with the prone position however.....
the v-bridle would have to provide enough slack to allow the prone pilot full range of control in the prone position....which is considerable.....it would have to allow the prone pilot to fully stuff the bar and this device might not keep his/her face outa the dirt but it would keep him/her from swinging all the way foreward to the nose of the glider. If this idea was incorporated WITH the swing down anti-whack device pictured above however it would work great for pilots in the prone position.
the pendular load that swings a pilots body up into the keel would shift once the pilots weight engages the v-bridal that runs up to the rear flying wires and runs up to the rear of the keel.
The air piston device could be incorporated to trigger the anti- whack device you illustrated so well in your computor model that swings down from the nose.
Since it is the sudden swinging foreward of the pilots body that shears a small pin that allows the keel to move foreward (about one foot foreward) and engages the air piston...
the same foreward movement of that same keel could release the anti-whack device (also attached to the keel) you have described to swing down into position (spring loaded to swing down then locks into place with small ratchet dogs perhaps)
I think these two ideas are compatable with each other.
For the fun of it I am building a full scale modal I am going to run down a zip line and crash with a couple hundred pounds of sandbags on board.....I am making my air piston from an old bicycle tire hand pump that has the exact same inside/outside specs as the rear keel on an old wills wing super sport frame that is in mothballs in my gargage....this will be fun...
I should have it all done in a couple days and ready to test.
I just need to track down a couple very long ropes for the zip line.....I think I need a rope about 150 feet long and another one about 250 feet long. If anyone has either of those two ropes laying around and wants to mail them to me I would mail them back after the testing.....they need to be strong enough to bear the weight of the sandbags and the hang glider frame I am going to send crashing into the ground at about a 30 degree angle....
I would try to be careful with the ropes but I might be attaching to some trees so I may not be able to keep some pitch from dripping into them somewhere....so....preferably an old, worn out rope you dont care about anymore.
I will video the whole thing and post it here at US hAWKS of course.....cant wait...I just LOVE crashing things into the ground!
reluctantsparrow
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 257
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2016 6:13 pm
Location: Morton, Wa.

Re: Safe-Splat

Postby KaiMartin » Mon Apr 25, 2016 12:48 pm



RickMasters wrote:Note the elastic "V" cord, pulled by two teams running at 30-45 degrees away from the center line, makes it impossible for the glider to lock out or even veer to the side.


The glider is equipped with flaps and a regular tail plane. This effectively prevents the condition we call "lock-out".

When I mentioned the danger of lock-outs to the pilots of the local sail plane group (Akkaflieg Hannover), they had no idea what I was talking about. When I explained to them and confirmed that lock-outs are a major danger with all kinds of HG tow, they shook their heads. A sail plane with similar behaviour would be deemed not airworthy. Digging deeper, the Akkaflieg pilots felt hang gliders generally lacked adequate control. Some would never consider flying HG because of this.

---<)kaimartin(>---
KaiMartin
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 146
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2015 11:43 am

Re: Safe-Splat

Postby reluctantsparrow » Mon Apr 25, 2016 3:21 pm

I left this morning after posting my idea and went out back and built it. it was very easy to build...I also took video and gave a short presentation on how it might work but I have wasted all morning trying to upload my video to youtube...I am basically a handicapped person when it comes to most things internet. I will see here if I can upload a picture of the keel with the bicycle tire pump spliced into it.
Attachments
CIMG0001.JPG
CIMG0001.JPG (238.64 KiB) Viewed 3947 times
reluctantsparrow
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 257
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2016 6:13 pm
Location: Morton, Wa.

Re: Safe-Splat

Postby reluctantsparrow » Mon Apr 25, 2016 4:01 pm

okay...going to try sharing video....here goes....
I keep saying rear flying wire in the video when I meant to say rear landing wire......so much for memorizing my lines
reluctantsparrow
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 257
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2016 6:13 pm
Location: Morton, Wa.

Re: Safe-Splat

Postby reluctantsparrow » Mon Apr 25, 2016 5:48 pm

All re-assembled and ready to crash test....need a rope for a zip line though
reluctantsparrow
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 257
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2016 6:13 pm
Location: Morton, Wa.

Re: Safe-Splat

Postby Rick Masters » Mon Apr 25, 2016 6:34 pm

Gee. Just when I've grown fond of grabbing onto a downtube and swinging through the control frame into the undersurface of my sail...
Old habits die hard.

And tying any line to my harness makes me nervous.
It's one more thing for the emergency reserve to foul in.

Also, I swing my body a lot to initiate adverse yaw.
I go parallel with the basetube.
It's important that nothing interfere with that.

I can't say half my wrecks have been nose-ins.
They've been more interesting...     :o
The idea in a serious wreck is to crumple the airframe around you.
Let it take the blows and you get your best chance to walk away.
Rick Masters
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 3260
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 5:11 am

Re: Safe-Splat

Postby reluctantsparrow » Tue Apr 26, 2016 7:30 am

I dont think my compressible keel is going to work very well with prone actually. I like bobs idea of an anti-whack device that parallels the front flying wires and flips down into position to prevent nose-overs better than my idea....but....the two ideas would work well together since Bobs idea attaches to the front of the keel and my idea takes place the instant the pilots body swings foreward far enough to engage the compressible keel. the compressible keel would be the trigger and tied into a latch release on Bobs device.
Bobs device could be made to swing down into position very quickly with ratchet dogs clicking as it comes down. It would be okay if it did not come down all the way before final impact. Even if it only made it down a few inches I think it would help considerably.
Bobs device would add weight and drag to the glider. My device adds a wee bit of weight and extra drag by the single bridle line.
I dont know how soon I will find a rope to test it out. I think it is going to fail on several points but I will try and catch all the failed points on film. I will draw lines on the compressible part of the keel so we can calculate the compression rate and movements of my device.
I will also strap on a GpS so record the speed acquired.
I think my device is going to work better with suprone. I think for the first test I will use a suprone harness for the test.. there will be many tests if I dont destroy the airframe immediatly. I am going to replace the speedbar with a straight bar. Maybe even just a steel water pipe so that part of the glider will not be destroyed and multiple tests can be done.
re-rigging for multiple tests is going to be ultra simple if no damage is done to the airframe. simply pull the keel back into position and put in another pop rivit.

We should start a betting pool on what is going to fail and what is going to work. After loading a prone or suprone harness with sandbags and am going to tie on a balloon where the pilots head should be. Might even draw a happy face on it. Part of the betting could be if the balloon was going to break or not break....

I will start....I think limiting the foreward swing too quickly is going to increase the upward swing into the keel depending on how much energy the...sponge...effect of the compressible keel can suck up.
I think the first test with nothing but a tire pump is definitely going to fail but a person has to start somewhere and a tire pump for $9.96 was within my budget. I beefed up the weak parts of the pump as best I could.

yep, first test is probably going to be a balloon buster.....thats my bet.

As far as the bridle interfering with yaw inputs....The bridle is going to have to be long enough to allow a prone pilot to fully stuff the bar without interferring obviously. this is going to make it pretty slack when the pilots body is in the bar position most yaw inputs are made at. I dont know if enough slack will be in the line to not interfere with yaw inputs but the fact that enough slack is going to have to be given to a prone pilot to allow him/her to fully stuff the bar leads me to suspect this device is not going to work well for prone...
These are things the testing will hopefully show.
reluctantsparrow
User avatar
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 257
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2016 6:13 pm
Location: Morton, Wa.

Re: Safe-Splat

Postby Rick Masters » Tue Apr 26, 2016 8:01 am

The glider is equipped with flaps and a regular tail plane. This effectively prevents the condition we call "lock-out".
When I mentioned the danger of lock-outs to the pilots of the local sail plane group (Akkaflieg Hannover), they had no idea what I was talking about.

You're right. I had been thinking about towing weightshift gliders with a "V" arrangement using synchronized winches - something that I don't think has ever been done.
Sailplane towing crashes are usually related to stalling and diving, either on an attempted return to the runway after a low release, or line/link breakage or unintentional release at high AOA. I think I've run across a report or two of true sailplane lockouts occurring after loss of a rudder or control linkage failure, followed by the line parting and a sideslip
...the Akkaflieg pilots felt hang gliders generally lacked adequate control. Some would never consider flying HG because of this.

I would agree that hang gliders and paragliders lack adequate control for towing. In foot-launching and during flight, however, I consider hang gliders more than adequate. Landings, well, sometimes a different story...
----------------------
first test with nothing but a tire pump

How about compressible foam instead of air?
Rick Masters
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 3260
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 5:11 am

PreviousNext
Forum Statistics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3715 guests

Options

Return to Hang Gliding General