Red wrote:I agree with the title of this thread, though.
Eventually SkippyBall replied:
SkippyBall (with minor edits) wrote:Why would I destroy a helmet that saved my life (and yours)?
And you say you want to go hang gliding again, which is still considered to be an extreme sport with possible deadly outcome?
Maybe you should not point your anger towards a hard working company, who provided you with a helmet that saved your life. And yes, I have had my major crash ending in hospital, thanking my helmet for saving my life.
I fly with my gear, knowing it won't fully protect me from heavy injury or death. And it is me being responsible for the outcome.
And yes, maybe there are better alternative helmets out there. I just have not found them yet.
The current Kali helmets are not my choice as a better alternative.
At the risk of losing a friend that I value very much, I think Skippy makes some very good points. After all, it's quite possible that if Chris had been flying a Falcon instead of a Predator, he might not have allowed himself to get so low. And even if he did, the Falcon might have been much easier to land in a difficult situation. Does that mean that someone should offer money for people to destroy their Predators?
I am not trying to be confrontational, but sometimes it's important to consider alternative perspectives. People choose different helmets and different gliders for their own different reasons. I don't know the details of either helmet, and I am not against any campaign to remove inferior products from the market, but I did want to add some sobering thoughts for those who are reaching for their pitch forks.