[Free]

Bille Floyd, recently made the mistake of voicing his opinion against socialism and open borders on the "Zac and AOC" thread on the 'second' largest hang gliding message board. Davis pounces, and bullies Bille back into submission a few minutes after Christmas day. Like a vampire or Satan, and quickly muscles poor Bille back into compliance.

Bille folds like a cheap lawn chair, immediately removes his follow up reply to Davis, and 2 days later, goes back and edits his initial comments on the thread made BEFORE Grendel's mother called him out.

Bille:
But i won't ever bring up a political discussion on OZ again ; unless
it has something to do with the USHPA.

(edited original post by Bille)
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php ... 8cf6a34cd6
Re: Zac and AOC Wed, Dec 25 2019, 8:18:09 pm
I Don't like that woman's, political views .

Bille
Last edited by Bille Fly on Fri, Dec 27 2019, 1:23:03 am; edited 1 time in total

=============

Davis' (Grendel's mother) smack down propaganda:

Post Re: Zac and AOC Thu, Dec 26 2019, 2:58:59 am
I don't know that those comments and beliefs have anything to do with anything.

The issue we are faced with now is not socialism, but fascism and mass hysteria. This is the moment whether democracy lives or dies.

Will the psychosis of the dear leader seduce the white nationalists (Republicans) in their mass delusion.

You are concerned about homelessness? Check that out with your NY-based investment banker.

[Free]

I've got more to say on this but running out of time today.
Others can comment, please.

Also Bille seems to fold on another thread where J. Deitch, posts a video of himself busting FARs on the Davis show.
Davis seems to like it, putting hang gliding at risk.
Comments?
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php ... 8cf6a34cd6

[Craig Muhonen]

The cloud flying aside, it's really nice to hear and watch a well choreographed presentation of "spirit flying".

Craig

[Free]

Davis emerges from the CRYPT post Christmas.. it was like he was holding it all back until the celebration of Christ's birth was over.. then he sprang like a viper when he hissed a forked tongue disparagement of a vast percentage of US population in a bigoted, vile propaganda utterance of Trump derangement syndrome, combined with ignorance and malice against red blooded American patriots and in effect, the Country, in general.

Davis Straub, hates America, so it seems.

Davis wrote:
The issue we are faced with now is not socialism, but fascism and mass hysteria. This is the moment whether democracy lives or dies.

The issue with AOC, the subject of the now edited, deleted and locked thread, IS socialism, plus fascism and mass hysteria. Davis lies for all the wrong reasons. Davis promotes socialism, fascism and mass hysteria with propaganda, lies and deception. It's what he does. To follow Davis and the socialist bartender from New York would be the moment democracy dies.

Will the psychosis of the dear leader seduce the white nationalists (Republicans) in their mass delusion.

The mass delusion is what Davis' black propaganda is all about. A nationalist is for his country. A patriot.
Davis is a globalist who is against his country. A traitor. A bigoted traitor, in that he hates white people.

You are concerned about homelessness? Check that out with your NY-based investment banker.

Here he shows his ignorance in trying to divide the country by labeling Trump a "NY-based investment banker."
I guess he thinks we should all be on board with hating NY-based investment bankers. Maybe he is talking about someone else?
What is it Davis? Who should we be hating?
Nationalist that happen to be white?
What about black Trump supporters? Are we supposed to hate them too?
And who are the investment bankers we are supposed to hate?
Give us a little more motivation to hate Trump, please.
Get your talking points in order and do a better job than you have done, so far.
Your work is not finished. You have more to do to earn your black devil's wings.
Why did you delete and edit comments that came in response to your propaganda?
Are you too cowardly to answer?

I think so... as has been your history.

[Free]

No one expects Davis to reply, did you?
He surely has so much more to say and yet he will not unless he can totally control the feed back.
All bullies are cowards.

Bille Floyd had more to say, and may have tried to comment again before Grendel's mother deleted his comments and locked the thread.
If it doesn't fit the narrative, it doesn't fly on the OZ Report.
Bille could always post his opinion here, if he wasn't already brainwashed against the US Hawks. Bille is pre-cowed against that, in addition to being a whipped pup of Davis' bullying.
He takes a licking and keeps on ticking with Davis approved posts to the bullied OZ message board.
He just doesn't care enough about the selective censorship there to take a stand for true justice and the right of free expression in what should be open conversation.
Too bad. Oppression wins again.

[Free]

The cloud flying aside, it's really nice to hear and watch a well choreographed presentation of "spirit flying".

Craig

Jonathan really wanted attention in posting video evidence and admission of busting FARs. He has to consider that he will get the attention he deserves.
What if a plane struck him in the clouds and crashed into the heavily populated area Jonathan Deitch was flying over.
Would that be a well choreographed presentation for the sport of hang gliding?

[Bob Kuczewski]

The cloud flying aside, it's really nice to hear and watch a well choreographed presentation of "spirit flying".

Craig

Jonathan really wanted attention in posting video evidence and admission of busting FARs. He has to consider that he will get the attention he deserves.
What if a plane struck him in the clouds and crashed into the heavily populated area Jonathan Deitch was flying over.
Would that be a well choreographed presentation for the sport of hang gliding?

I have to agree with you Warren. That was a stupid and dangerous thing for him to do. As you said, Jonathan craves the spotlight and will do almost anything to put himself on center stage. Jonathan has a long history of dangerous flying stunts that should have had him either disciplined or grounded years ago (landing in a detention facility, dropping smoke canisters over dry brush, at least one crash requiring hospitalization, and now flying in clouds). But he makes "cool" videos and that absolves him of everything in the eyes of USHPA. I'm beginning to agree with Tad that maybe there isn't enough intelligent life in this sport for it to survive.

[Craig Muhonen]

Boy did this young immature hawk, "Fall" out of the nest on that one.

I "fell" right into Their "SUCKER hole" didn't I.

Thanx Warren for "picking" me up and putting me back in the "nest".
You guys show me why it's the right decision to be a US HAWK instead of a "goonie bird".

T Y

[Bob Kuczewski]

Boy did this young immature hawk, "Fall" out of the nest on that one.

Thanx Warren for "picking" me up and putting me back in the "nest".

There are many potential perspectives on any topic. As humans we tend to adopt the first perspecitive that appears to us (or appeals to us). That's why first impressions are so powerful. They tend to lock you into one perspective and blind you to all others.

It's a relatively rare human being who can change their perspective (especially publicly) upon seeing another's perspective. I salute you Craig for being such a rare human being.



One of the reasons that I oppose censorship so strongly is that it robs all of us of those alternative perspectives that we so desperately need to avoid the "herd" mentality of groupthink. Yes, alternative perspectives can be uncomfortable, and they can even sometimes be extremely annoying. But they earn their keep by giving us a wider view (perspective) than we would have without them.
 
 
P.S. I used the term "groupthink" somewhat casually, so I looked it up on Wikipedia after my post. Here's most of the introductory section:

Groupthink is a psychological phenomenon that occurs within a group of people in which the desire for harmony or conformity in the group results in an irrational or dysfunctional decision-making outcome. Cohesiveness, or the desire for cohesiveness, in a group that may produce a tendency among its members to agree at all costs.[1] This causes the group to minimize conflict and reach a consensus decision without critical evaluation.

Groupthink requires individuals to avoid raising controversial issues or alternative solutions, and there is loss of individual creativity, uniqueness and independent thinking. The dysfunctional group dynamics of the "ingroup" produces an "illusion of invulnerability" (an inflated certainty that the right decision has been made). Thus the "ingroup" significantly overrates its own abilities in decision-making and significantly underrates the abilities of its opponents (the "outgroup"). Furthermore, groupthink can produce dehumanizing actions against the "outgroup". Members of a group can often feel peer pressure to "go along with the crowd" in fear of rocking the boat or of what them speaking up will do to the overall to how their teammates perceive them. Group interactions tend to favor, clear and harmonious agreements and it can be a cause for concern when little to no new innovations or arguments for better policies, outcomes and structures are called to question. (McLeod). Groupthink can often be referred to as a group of “yes men” because group activities and group projects in general make it extremely easy to pass on not offering constructive opinions.

Some methods that have been used to counteract group think in the past is selecting teams from more diverse backgrounds, and even mixing men and women for groups (Kamalnath). Groupthink can be considered by many to be a detriment to companies, organizations and in any work situations. Most positions that are senior level need individuals to be independent in their thinking. There is a positive correlation found between outstanding executives and decisiveness (Kelman). Groupthink also prohibits an organization from moving forward and innovating if no one ever speaks up and says something could be done differently.

Antecedent factors such as group cohesiveness, faulty group structure, and situational context (e.g., community panic) play into the likelihood of whether or not groupthink will impact the decision-making process.

Groupthink is a construct of social psychology, but has an extensive reach and influences literature in the fields of communication studies, political science, management, and organizational theory,[2] as well as important aspects of deviant religious cult behaviour.[3][4]

Groupthink is sometimes stated to occur (more broadly) within natural groups within the community, for example to explain the lifelong different mindsets of those with differing political views (such as "conservatism" and "liberalism" in the U.S. political context [5]) or the purported benefits of team work vs. work conducted in solitude.[6] However, this conformity of viewpoints within a group does not mainly involve deliberate group decision-making, and might be better explained by the collective confirmation bias of the individual members of the group.

                 - From: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groupthink