Torture Architect: Argues Indefinite Detention of Americans

A place for discussions that are NOT related to the US Hawks. This area is provided for the convenience of our members, but the US Hawks specifically does not endorse any comments posted in these forums.
Forum rules
Be Polite!!

This forum is for discussions that are NOT related to the US Hawks. This area is provided for the convenience of our members, but the US Hawks specifically does not endorse any comments posted in this forum.

Torture Architect: Argues Indefinite Detention of Americans

Postby Free » Wed Feb 29, 2012 5:07 pm

Torture Architect Argues For Indefinite Detention of Americans
ACLU: “Nothing short of chilling”

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Wednesday, February 29, 2012


In the aftermath of Barack Obama’s Presidential Policy Directive which forbids controversial provisions of the National Defense Authorization Act from being used against lawful residents, a former architect of the infamous Bush torture program today testified in favor of indefinite detention for US citizens.

Following the release of a White House “fact sheet” http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/NDAAFactSheetFINAL.pdf
which announced that “Section 1022 does not apply to U.S. citizens, and the President has decided to waive its application to lawful permanent residents arrested in the United States,” Steven G. Bradbury, former head of the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) in the United States Department of Justice under the Bush administration, testified today that the law should be applied to American citizens in order to deal with “homegrown terrorists”.

In his position as OLC head, Bradbury is widely acknowledged as one of the primary architects of the Bush torture program, having provided legal opinions that justified the kind of abuse that came to light in the aftermath of the Abu Ghraib scandal, which included torture by hanging, beating prisoners to death, raping women, and sodomizing detainees with batons and phosphorescent tubes.

Bradbury told a Senate Judiciary Committee that legislation which would limit the arbitrary application of indefinite detention provisions, the Due Process Guarantee Act, was dangerous because it would prevent US citizens labeled “enemy combatants,” from being interrogated by the military.

“If we capture on our soil a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident who is such an enemy recruit and has been actively involved in carrying out or otherwise aware of an unfolding plot by a foreign power against the United States, this proposed legislation could seriously impede our ability to gather critical intelligence from that combatant through military questioning,” Bradbury told the committee. “By requiring that criminal charges be brought against the detainee as a condition of this continued detention, the [Due Process Guarantee Act] would threaten to disrupt the practical opportunity to conduct such intelligence gathering.”

In response, Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.), who voted against the NDAA, requested that Bradbury’s involvement with the Bush torture scandal be included in the record.

“It’s nothing short of chilling that the Senate Judiciary Committee would have as a witness one of the architects of the torture program,” American Civil Liberties Union legislative counsel Chris Anders told Raw Story. “This is a person who wrote several memos that provide legal justification for the torture program during the Bush administration, and wrote memos on how to try to circumvent legal protections that Congress had put in place to block the use of torture and abuse of detainees.”

“For Congress to be relying on someone who has shown so little disregard for the law that he would say that it’s legally okay to waterboard people and use other torture tactics against them is remarkable. It’s remarkable and it’s wrong.”

However, Sen. Lindsey Graham supported Bradbury’s position, arguing that “The homeland is part of the battlefield,” and that so-called enemy combatants, even if they are American citizens, should be treated as terrorists.

As we explained in our previous article,
http://www.prisonplanet.com/obama-issues-policy-directive-exempting-american-citizens-from-indefinite-detention.html

although Obama’s PPD on exempting Americans from being subject to indefinite detention represents a worthy victory for civil libertarians, it comes after the administration itself
http://www.prisonplanet.com/obama-administration-demanded-power-to-indefinitely-detain-u-s-citizens.html
demanded such provisions be applied to US citizens in the first place.

It also provides no guarantee that a future administration, which could be in office in less than a year, will not use the ‘kidnapping provisions’ against US citizens. This is all the more reason to support efforts by states such as Virginia and Utah to repudiate the NDAA altogether.

*********************

Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a regular fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show and Infowars Nightly News.


Similar/Related Articles


1.Obama Issues ‘Policy Directive’ Exempting American Citizens From Indefinite Detention
2.New Amendments Introduced To Halt Indefinite Detention of Americans
3.Happy New Year: Obama Signs NDAA, Indefinite Detention Now Law of the Land
4.Rand Paul: Americans Could Be Sent to Gitmo Under ‘Indefinite Detention’ Bill
5.Utah Lawmakers Urge Congress to Repeal ‘Indefinite Detention’ Law
6.Explaining to a 5-Year Old Why the Indefinite Detention Bill DOES Apply to U.S. Citizens on U.S. Soil
7.40 Members of Congress Protest ‘Indefinite Detention’ Bill
8.Obama’s U-Turn On Indefinite Detention Bill a “Historic Tragedy” For Rights
9.‘Indefinite Detention’ Bill Heads To Obama’s Desk As White House Drops Veto Threat
10.‘Indefinite Detention’ Bill Passes Senate 93-7
11.The Indefinite Detention Bill DOES Apply to American Citizens on U.S. Soil
12.Journalist Sues Obama Over Indefinite Detention Law



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Article printed from Infowars: http://www.infowars.com

URL to article: http://www.infowars.com/torture-archite ... americans/
User avatar
Free
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 1084
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 8:47 pm

Obama Demanded Power To Indefinitely Detain U.S. Citizens

Postby Free » Wed Feb 29, 2012 5:18 pm



- Prison Planet.com - http://www.prisonplanet.com -

Obama Administration Demanded Power To Indefinitely Detain U.S. Citizens

Posted By admin On December 12, 2011 @ 5:05 am In Featured Stories,News In Focus,Paul Watson Articles,Tile | Comments Disabled

White House removed language that would have protected Americans from Section 1031 of NDAA

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Monday, December 12, 2011

Despite reports that Obama is planning to veto the National Defense Authorization Act, Senator Carl Levin has revealed it was the administration itself that lobbied to remove language from the bill that would have protected American citizens from being detained indefinitely without trial.


“The language which precluded the application of Section 1031 to American citizens was in the bill that we originally approved…and the administration asked us to remove the language which says that U.S. citizens and lawful residents would not be subject to this section,” said Levin, Chairman of the Armed Services Committee.

“It was the administration that asked us to remove the very language which we had in the bill which passed the committee…we removed it at the request of the administration,” said Levin, emphasizing, “It was the administration which asked us to remove the very language the absence of which is now objected to.”

Section 1031 of the NDAA bill, which itself defines the entirety of the United States as a “battlefield,” allows American citizens to be snatched from the streets, carted off to a foreign detention camp and held indefinitely without trial. The bill states that “any person who has committed a belligerent act” faces indefinite detention, but no trial or evidence has to be presented, the White House merely needs to make the accusation.

An amendment introduced by Democratic Senator Feinstein, described as “cleverly worded nonsense” by Congressman Justin Amash, does not protect Americans from being subject to the provision.

“The Feinstein Amendment 1031(e) is dangerously misleading,” writes John Wood of Change.org [1], which is running a petition to oppose the signing of the bill. “Don’t be fooled: In the text of 1031(e), “Nothing in this section shall be construed…”, the only word that matters is “construed” because the Supreme Court are the only ones with the power to construe the law. The Feinstein Amendment 1031(e) permits citizens to be imprisoned without evidence or a trial forever, if the Supreme Court does not EXPLICITLY repeal 1031.”

The Obama administration never had a problem with Section 1031 of the bill and indeed acted to ensure it applied to American citizens. Doubts over whether or not Obama would veto the bill only arose out of issues with Section 1032, which pertains to the military being required to take custody of individuals.

“Confusingly, Obama threatened a veto for 1032, but NOT 1031. 1032 is UNRELATED to imprisoning citizens without a trial. Obama has never suggested using a veto to stop Section 1031 citizen imprisonment,” writes Wood.

The notion that the administration lobbied for language that would have protected American citizens and legal residents from indefinite detention to be removed from the bill is unsurprising given Obama’s policy with regard to predator drone strikes.

The White House has asserted the right to carry out state-sponsored assassination anywhere in the world without having to provide any evidence or go through any legal process. The administration merely has to state that the target is a terrorist and it doesn’t matter whether they are an American citizen or not, as we saw in the case of American-born Anwar al-Awlaki and his son [2] who were both killed earlier this year.

Indeed, at the start of the month, Obama administration lawyers reaffirmed their backing [3] for state sponsored assassination.

Congress has until tomorrow to block the law before it heads to President Obama’s desk. Putting faith in an administration that has formalized state-sponsored assassination of U.S. citizens without trial to block the ‘indefinite detention’ provision of the NDAA bill is naive to say the least.

*********************

Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com [4]. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a regular fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Article printed from Prison Planet.com: http://www.prisonplanet.com

URL to article: http://www.prisonplanet.com/obama-admin ... izens.html

URLs in this post:

[1] writes John Wood of Change.org: http://www.change.org/petitions/stop-nd ... ore-dec-13

[2] American-born Anwar al-Awlaki and his son: http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/awlaki-fa ... uXmgWMr2dA

[3] Obama administration lawyers reaffirmed their backing: http://news.yahoo.com/obama-lawyers-cit ... 13473.html

[4] Prison Planet.com: http://prisonplanet.com/
User avatar
Free
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 1084
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 8:47 pm


Return to Free Speech Zone / Off-Mission Discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests